Worked example

A sample processing statement, broken down line by line

This is a fictional statement built to show the kinds of charges that can hide in plain sight. The numbers are made up. The fee types are realistic examples, not a claim about any specific processor.

Fictional sample. Cedar Ridge Auto & Tire does not exist. This statement was created by Tenmile Ledger for education only.
SAMPLE ONLY

Merchant Processing Statement

Cedar Ridge Auto & Tire July 1–31, 2026

Merchant ID
•••• 4821
Card sales$118,642.37
Transactions2,431
Total fees$3,418.47
Effective rate2.88%

Interchange & network costs

Interchange and network fees
FeeAmountTenmile view
Interchange$1,865.42Generally pass-through
Card-network assessments$260.42Generally pass-through

Processor pricing

Processor pricing
FeeCalculationAmountTenmile view
Processor markup0.55% of volume$652.53Negotiable
Processor per-item fee$0.10 × 2,431$243.10Negotiable

Account, compliance & add-on fees

Account compliance and add-on fees
FeeAmountTenmile view
PCI non-compliance fee$79.95Often avoidable
PCI program / admin fee$19.95Ask about it
Monthly account fee$49.95Negotiable
Statement fee$12.95Negotiable
Batch fees$4.50Negotiable
Gateway fee$25.00Depends on setup
AVS fees$30.75Depends on setup
Annual membership fee$99.00Worth challenging
Regulatory / admin fee$19.95Ask what it is
Chargeback fee$25.00Check contract
Next-day funding fee$30.00Optional if unused
Total processing fees$3,418.47

What jumps out first?

The statement is not terrible just because the effective rate is 2.88%. That number includes interchange and network costs that are not the processor's ordinary markup. The useful question is how much of the bill the processor actually controls.

In this sample, $2,125.84 is interchange and network assessment cost. The processor pricing itself is $895.63, before the account and add-on fees are counted. That is where the review starts getting interesting.

The PCI non-compliance fee deserves immediate attention

The $79.95 PCI non-compliance fee is the kind of line item that can sit on a statement month after month because nobody notices it. PCI DSS compliance is a real obligation. The fee shown here, however, is not a fee charged by the PCI Security Standards Council. In this fictional example, it is a processor or acquirer fee tied to the account being marked non-compliant.

The first move would be to find out why the account is marked that way. If the merchant simply has not completed the required validation, fixing the compliance status may remove the recurring fee. That is different from negotiating a lower price. Sometimes the right answer is to make the fee unnecessary.

Important: PCI requirements vary with the merchant's environment and validation path. A processing-cost review can spot the fee, but Tenmile is not acting as a PCI assessor.

The markup is the biggest recurring negotiation target

The processor is charging 0.55% plus $0.10 per transaction. On this month's volume, that adds up to $895.63. The numbers look small when written as basis points and pennies. They look different once they are applied to nearly $119,000 in card volume.

This is the part of the statement Tenmile would compare against the account, the processing setup and any current offer from the processor. Interchange is not the negotiation target here. The processor's layer is.

The small fees are not actually that small

There is a monthly account fee, statement fee, batch fee, gateway fee, AVS fee, PCI program fee, admin fee and next-day funding fee. Not every one of those should automatically disappear. Some may pay for something the business uses.

But they should at least have a reason to exist. On this sample, the recurring account and add-on fees that deserve a closer look total $273 before the annual fee and chargeback fee are counted. That is enough money to stop treating them as background noise.

What Tenmile would probably leave alone

The $1,865.42 of interchange and $260.42 of card-network assessments would not be presented to the owner as easy processor savings. Visa describes interchange as a transfer fee between acquiring and issuing banks, and Mastercard says its interchange rates are established by Mastercard while acquirer-to-merchant pricing is separate.

Those costs still matter. They help explain the total bill, and transaction qualification can affect what interchange category applies. But calling ordinary interchange “processor markup” would give the owner the wrong picture.

What a negotiated outcome could look like

To make the math concrete, suppose the processor agreed to reduce the markup from 0.55% + $0.10 to 0.25% + $0.05, the merchant completed PCI validation and the processor removed a few account-level fees. This is a fictional outcome, not a promise of what any real processor would accept.

Original processor markup$895.63
Illustrative new markup$418.16
Markup difference$477.47/mo
Other illustrative fee reductions$172.85/mo

That hypothetical produces about $650.32 in recurring monthly savings, or roughly $7,803.84 over a year if the volume and fee structure stayed similar. Again, those numbers are here to show how statement math works. They are not a savings guarantee.

How Tenmile would handle a statement like this

  1. Separate the bill. Interchange, assessments, processor markup and account fees get put into different buckets.
  2. Flag the avoidable items. A PCI non-compliance fee gets investigated instead of quietly treated as a permanent cost.
  3. Identify the processor-controlled pricing. The basis-point markup, per-item pricing and processor-added fees become the negotiation list.
  4. Ask the current processor first. A processor switch is not the default answer if the existing setup works.
  5. Verify the result. New statements are compared with the old pricing so the savings are based on what actually changed.

What Tenmile would ask the owner

Before negotiating anything, there are a few practical questions: Is next-day funding actually needed? Is the gateway separate from the processor? Has PCI validation been completed? Is the annual fee contractual? Has the processor already offered a pricing review? Those answers keep the negotiation focused on fees that can actually move.

Source notes

This sample is fictional, but the distinctions behind it are not. These primary sources explain the parts that matter most:

Reviewed for accuracy by Braden, founder of Tenmile Ledger.Merchant services and payments experience across processing, treasury and payment operations.